Thune: Republicans Protect Decades of Senate Precedent on Confirmations
“[T]he amendment to the rules Republicans are proposing is an idea with bipartisan pedigree … And it would restore sanity to a confirmation process that Democrats and Republicans alike have complained is broken.”
Click here to watch the video.
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor:
Thune’s remarks below (as delivered):
“Mr. President, as expected, there has been some Democrat commentary on the process I initiated Monday: a process to restore Senate precedent and codify in Senate rules what was once understood to be standard practice – and that is the Senate acting expeditiously on presidential nominees to allow a president to get his team in place.
“I will say that the commentary has felt somewhat muted so far – and I suspect that is because Democrats know they don’t have a leg to stand on here.
“After years of partisanship and slowly eroding the confirmation process, they finally went all-in and broke it.
“And they have to know that.
“And so it’s no surprise that they aren’t exactly able to mount a compelling defense of their position – or a compelling attack on Republicans’ move to fix the Senate.
“On top of that, I suspect it’s even possible that some Democrats are secretly relieved that we’re restoring Senate precedent.
“After all, I suspect Democrats would prefer not to reap what they’ve sowed this Congress.
“The prospect of blanket obstruction of every single nominee of a Democrat president can’t look that attractive.
“Of course the Democrat leader has made an attempt to attack Republicans’ measure and defend his party’s historic obstruction.
“And one thing he’s fixated on is his claim that Democrats’ historic obstruction is justified because President Trump has put forward ‘historically bad’ nominees.
“But I’d just like to ask, Mr. President.
“If these nominees are as ‘historically bad’ as the Democrat leader claims, why are Democrats voting for them in committee or on the Senate floor?
“Why have 62 of the 139 civilian nominees the Senate’s confirmed so far been confirmed with Democrat support?
“Why are Trump nominees emerging from committee with bipartisan support?
“Is the Democrat leader suggesting that his own members are supporting ‘historically bad’ nominees?
“On Monday the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman came down to the floor and asked for unanimous consent to confirm a nominee for U.S. attorney who was reported from committee by voice vote and who has the support of the two Democrat senators from his state.
“Is the Democrat leader suggesting that the senior Democrat from Minnesota and the junior Democrat from Minnesota are conspiring with President Trump to put in place ‘historically bad’ nominees?
“Mr. President, I completely respect Democrats’ right to dislike some – or, for that matter, many – of President Trump’s nominees, and to oppose nominees that they consider to be ‘historically bad.’
“I’ve opposed more than one Democrat nominee in my time here.
“But let’s get real here.
“This obstruction is not about ‘historically bad’ nominees.
“The scores of nominees who have emerged from committee with bipartisan support are not ‘historically bad.’
“The U.S. attorney candidate for Minnesota supported by the senior Democrat senator from Minnesota and the junior Democrat senator from Minnesota is not a ‘historically bad’ nominee.
“And the only reason – the only reason – the Democrat leader objected to his confirmation by voice vote Monday – along with the confirmation of a Trump nominee who had previously been nominated by President Biden – is petty partisanship.
“Petty partisanship that is well on its way to turning the Senate from a legislative body into, in the words of the senior Democrat from Minnesota, and I quote, a ‘full-time employment agency.’
“Mr. President, before I close I also want to mention one other complaint from the Democrat leader yesterday, and that is his claim that Republicans’ attempt to restore Senate precedent on en bloc consideration of nominees is somehow going to eliminate transparency.
“To hear the Democrat leader tell it, you’d think the Senate was going to start approving nominees in the dead of night behind closed doors in the Capitol basement.
“I didn’t notice the Democrat leader objecting to a lack of transparency when we approved packages of Biden nominees – some of which probably did happen in the dark of night, albeit in the full light of the C-SPAN cameras.
“And of course I should also mention that before any floor consideration, all of these nominees will have gone through the committee process, which will have provided still another forum for members to air concerns.
“Mr. President, the amendment to the rules Republicans are proposing is an idea with bipartisan pedigree.
“It would restore Senate precedent.
“And it would restore sanity to a confirmation process that Democrats and Republicans alike have complained is broken.
“Now, despite their historic blockade, I think a lot of my Democrat colleagues are well aware that we can’t continue as we are.
“And so I say to those colleagues – many of whom I know do care about this institution – join us.
“Let’s protect decades of Senate precedent on confirmations and get this institution fully functioning again.”
Related Issues: Nominations
Next Previous
